MEI STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Middleton Environmental Incorporated (MEI)
is a multi-faceted firm that offers a broad range of professional
services. MEI offers the public, corporate or individual
clients, a broad range of professional services including
the services of environmental planners, engineers and architects.
The skills of an experienced staff, coupled with the ability
to bring specialized consultant services to bear upon the
delivery of these services, offers the client the highest
possible level of professional performance. MEI also has
the capacity to develop joint venture client services, utilizing
associated firms of exemplary caliber to tailor fit particularized
services to particular project demands.
MEI seeks to join timely delivery of client
services to the need for valid, creditable and superior
results. The management of project performance, including
the submission of periodic client progress reports, provides
the foundation of the MEI management method. MEI services
will be presented to the client in a timely fashion and
will be represented, as necessary, at public forums, hearings
or regulatory related proceedings.
Our senior staff includes individuals with
extensive experience in industry, local government and environmental
problem solving, involving federal, state and local laws.
The clients have ranged from small entrepreneurs to large
industrial organizations. The combination of environmental
management, manufacturing and engineering skills provide
our clients with timely solutions to their problems.
For more information
please click on the links below or scroll
down the page. To return to the links click
on the link marked Top^
on the right side of the page after each section
and you will return to this area.
|
| |
Top
of Page ^ |
|
MEI is prepared to offer the following services in environmental
planning, comprehensive development and design:
ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE ASSESSMENT SERVICES
- Phase One Environmental Site Assessment
Reports
- Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment
Reports
- Soil, Water & Air Analyses
- Tank Testing
- Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Studies
- Asbestos Management
- Transaction Screen Process Reports
- Lead Based Paint Testing &Management
Top
^
ENVIRONMENTAL
PLANNING
- Environmental Impact Studies
- Health Effect Analysis
- Toxic Analysis
- Testing Services
- Permit Services
- Pollution Control
- Monitoring and Surveillance
- Resource Management
- Waste Management
- Recycling Studies
- Ecological and Archaeological Investigations
Top
^
DEVELOPMENT
& DESIGN
- Housing Rehabilitation and Renovation
- School Design
- Co-op Construction and Sale
- Adaptive Reuse for Housing & Educational
Use
- Office Rehabilitation and Renovation
Design
- Housing Construction
- Real Estate Brokerage
- Construction Cost Estimating
- Plan and Zoning Approvals
- Code Compliance
- Space Planning and Land Use
-
Site Planning
Top
^
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
MEI is a small firm (formerly MKA), founded
in 1983 with in-depth experience in environmental planning,
comprehensive design and development services. The principals,
staff and associated consulting experts at MEI have a solid
foundation and proven excellence in a wide range of professional
services. The following is a partial listing of projects
that have been managed by principals of MEI and MKA.
Environmental Site Assessment Program:
1986 to Present
The Environmental Site Assessment Program
is a Four-Phased effort aimed at helping clients (banks,
private corporations, lending institutions, insurance companies,
etc.) to assess and avoid the enormous clean-up liability
and litigation costs so often associated with asbestos or
hazardous waste contaminated properties.
Top
^
Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment/Transaction Screen Process (TSP) Reporting:
The Phase
I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and TSP’s
are conducted in order to determine any potential recognized
environmental conditions that may have an adverse impact
on the subject site as well as the value of such site under
the American Society of Testing and Materials Standard E1527-94/E1528-94.
All Phase I ESA and TSP reports must conform to this standard
in order to quality for the “Innocent Landowner Defense”
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Cleanup Liability
Act (CERCLA). The Phase I ESA consists of a site investigation
of any structures and outside grounds for the possible presence
of Potential Asbestos Containing Materials (PACM), 55 gallon
drum storage, above ground storage tanks, lead based paint
conditions, floor drains or any areas of particular environmental
concern. The site investigation also attempts to locate
buried storage tanks, transformers, cesspools/drywells (if
any), in order to determine if any related environmental
problems may exist with the site. All documentation pertaining
to the present and past usage of the site are obtained in
order to evaluate the potential for improper chemical disposal
on the subject site. The surrounding sites area also examined
(to the fullest extent possible), in order to determine
if the past and current land use could have an apparent
adverse impact on the subject site.
During the preparation of the Phase I ESA
report, environmental databases are reviewed in order to
determine if there are any hazardous waste sites, landfills,
leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) sites, hazardous
waste generators or cases of improper chemical disposal
on the subject site or within the vicinity of the subject
site that may adversely impact the property. Databases such
as the USEPA’s NPL, CERCLIS and RCRA databases as
well as state and local hazardous waste site lists are also
examined in order to ascertain whether any hazardous wastes,
landfills, oil spills or any related problems exist at the
subject site or in the vicinity of the subject site.
If the physical site inspection, historical
site analysis and review of regulatory agency records demonstrate
that a large scale contamination concern does not exist
regarding the subject site, the Phase I ESA report is submitted
and our service is completed.
Top
^
ESA PROGRAM
HISTORY
Since 1988, MEI has prepared over 10,000
Environmental Site Assessment & Transaction Screen Process
Reports on commercial, industrial and multi-family properties
for lending institutions in the tri-state area and throughout
the nation. MEI has examined buildings that have ranged
in size from 800 square feet to over 1.5 million square
feet. Below is a highlighted list of properties that were
examined in the past by MEI (clients are not listed for
confidentiality purposes):
1. Penta Hotel: Seventh Avenue, New York.
Twenty Six (26) story hotel in the heart of New York City
(approximately 1.5 million square feet in size).
2. Macy’s Former World Headquarters:
Newark, New Jersey. Vacant twelve (12) story commercial
building approximately 1.25 million square feet in size.
3. Hygrade Metal Moulding: Smith Street,
East Farmingdale. Single story industrial building approximately
25,000 square feet in size. Site was placed on the New York
State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC),
Inactive Hazardous Waste Site list after Phase I, Phase
II and Phase III environmental investigations. Remediation
is underway.
4. MEI has examined over 750,000 square
feet of industrial buildings in the Hauppauge Industrial
Area (Oser Avenue buildings, Commerce Drive buildings, Willets
Path Buildings, etc..). This area is highly industrialized
and contains ten hazardous waste sites.
5. MEI has examined over 450,000 square
feet of industrial buildings in the East Farmingdale Industrial
Area (Smith Street buildings, Schmitt Boulevard buildings,
etc..). This area is highly industrialized and contains
twelve hazardous waste sites.
6. MEI has examined over 500,000 square
feet of industrial buildings in the Plainview Industrial
Area (Skyline Drive buildings, Express Drive South buildings,
etc..). This area is highly industrialized and contains
three hazardous waste sites.
7. MEI has examined over 500,000 square
feet of industrial buildings in the Ronkonkoma Industrial
area (Second Avenue buildings, Fifth Avenue buildings, etc..).
8. MEI has examined over 10,000,000 square
feet of multi-family buildings in the New York City Metropolitan
area over the past 5 years. Phase I and Transaction Screen
Process Report have been prepared through the metropolitan
area.
9. MEI has examined
over 1,000 acres of vacant land for the Suffolk County Department
of Real Estate for open space preservation.
Top
^
Environmental
Site Assessment Program
Partial List of Program Clients, Addresses
and Phone Numbers
North Fork Bank
275 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
(516) 844 - 1000 |
Independence Savings Bank
551 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY
(212) 209-9250 |
Brooklyn Federal
Savings Bank
81 Court Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
(718) 855 - 8500 |
Richmond County Savings Bank
4523 Amboy Road
Staten Island, NY 10312
(718) 635 - 4800 |
American Community
Bank
300 Glen Street
Glen Cove, NY 11542
(516) 609-2900 |
Long Island Commercial Bank
1 Suffolk Squre
Islandia, NY 11722
(631) 348 - 0888 |
Bank of China
410 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10017
(212) 935 - 3101 |
Bank of East Asia
202 Canal Street
New York, NY 10013
(212) 238 - 8268 |
Roslyn Savings Bank
Roslyn, NY 11576
(516) 621 - 6000 |
Citigroup
Uniondale, NY 11555
(516) 296 - 5647
|
Apple Bank for Savings
277 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10172
(212) 224 - 6520 |
State Bank of Long Island
1981 Marcus Avenue
Lake Success, NY 11042
(516) 437 - 3327 |
Sterling National Bank
355 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10018
(212) 575-5220 |
Metropolitan
National Bank
2 Park Avenue – 14th Floor
New York, NY 10016
(212) 683-0800 |
Bank of Smithtown
1 East Main Street
Smithtown, NY 11787
(631) 360-9382 |
Bridgehampton
National Bank
2200 Montauk Highway
Bridgehampton, NY 11932
(631) 537-1000 |
Country Bank
200 East 42nd Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10017
(212) 883-6498 |
National Bank of New York City
136-29 38th Avenue
Flushing, NY 11354
(718) 358-4400 |
Top
^
Phase II Environmental
Site Assessment:
If a recognized environmental condition
is suspected during the preparation of the Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment Report, a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
is conducted in order to evaluate the extent and type of
contamination that may exist on the subject site.
Depending upon the type of recognized environmental
condition that was observed during the Phase I ESA, samples
of asbestos, lead based paint, on-site soils, cesspool/drywell
sediments and groundwater can be extracted and analyzed
at a certified testing laboratory in order to determine
if elevated levels of contamination have impacted the subject
site.
Elevated levels of contamination can
have a large impact on the value of the property. The Phase
II ESA report will indicate the levels of contamination
observed during the extraction of samples from the property,
recommend a method of cleanup of the contamination and estimate
cleanup costs.
Top
^
Phase III Environmental
Site Assessments:
The Phase III ESA is the remedial phase
of the ESA Program. If contamination is encountered during
a Phase II ESA, the Phase III ESA will involve the planning
and methodology of environmental remediation. Costs associated
with conducting a Phase III ESA will vary greatly due to
factors such as the nature and extent of contamination,
contaminant type and method of contamination disposal.
Top
^
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT PROJECTS (MKA)
Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) Environmental
Assessment Report:
Main Line Electrification Project Hicksville to Ronkonkoma
(1984)
Developed a comprehensive Environmental
Assessment Report analyzing the impacts associated with
electrification of the Long Island Rail Road's Main Line.
The $150 million project entailed the construction of eight
modern stations, sixteen electric power sub-stations, signal
communications modernization, and the construction of twelve
parking lots for 7,000 cars. Of nineteen potential environmental
impacts, nine were judged to be of no major significance
and ten were found to be of possible significance. Five
of the ten had the potential for adverse impact including
traffic, parking, community disruption, secondary development
and impact on an ecologically sensitive area.
Overall, the report recommended a "Finding
of No Significant Impact" under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). The Federal Urban Mass Transportation
Administration accepted this recommendation and, as a result,
the first $50 million in federal funds for the project were
released in September 1984. The project has since been completed
and full electric service between New York City and Ronkonkoma,
at the end of the Main Line, was initiated in January, 1988.
Top
^
Long
Island Rail Road Environmental Assessment Report:
Port Jefferson Branch Electrification
Project - Huntington to Port Jefferson (1985)
Developed a comprehensive Environmental
Assessment Report analyzing the impacts associated with
electrification of the Long Island Rail Road's Port Jefferson
Branch. The $120 million project entailed the construction
of seven modern stations, fifteen electric power sub-stations,
signal and communications modernization, and construction
of ten parking lots for 6,000 cars. Of nineteen potential
environmental impacts, ten were judged to be of no major
significance and nine were found to be of possible significance.
Four of the ten had the potential for adverse impact, (traffic,
parking community disruption and secondary development).
Overall, the report recommended a "Finding
of No Significant Impact" under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). Due to a lack of funding, the project
has been scaled down and was completed in 1989.
Top
^
Long Island
Rail Road Environmental Assessment Report:
Port Jefferson Branch Improvement Project
Conducted an Environmental Assessment
in 1987 to examine and evaluate the potential environmental
impacts associated with the improvements to the Port Jefferson
Branch of the Long Island Rail Road. The planned improvements
included the installation of a 2,200 volt signal line; construction
of motor generator buildings in Greenlawn, Smithtown and
Port Jefferson; construction of high
level platform stations in Stony Brook and Port Jefferson;
and the installation of a new refueling facility in Port
Jefferson. Of the nineteen primary potential environmental
impacts, it was determined that the project would represent
a significant overall improvement in the protection of the
Long Island environment. The project was completed in 1989.
Top
^
Carleton Avenue
Development Project: Central Islip, New York;
Planned Development District Environmental
Impact Statement (1988)
This comprehensive Environmental Impact
Statement analyzed the environmental impacts associated
with the construction of 600 town house units, 1.7 million
square feet of industrial/research space, 200,000 square
feet of office development, and a "Town Center"
including a 200 room hotel and 200,000 additional square
feet of retail space on an 800 acre parcel (at the Central
Islip State Psychiatric Center site). Impacts analyzed in
association with this project included community character
and service, physical changes to the area, traffic and groundwater
quality and quantity. The Final EIS was adopted by the Town
of Islip in August 1988.
Top
^
Mixed Use Development
of 88 Acre Fairchild/Republic Property: Farmingdale, New
York;
Environmental Assessment and Impact
Statement (1988)
The planned mixed use development project
called for a two phase environmental assessment and impact
statement. Included in the two phases were assessment of
real and potential problems at the site and an on-going
evaluation of closure, clean-up and groundwater monitoring
plans as well as preparation of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement.
Top
^
East Hampton
Airport Master Plan: Environmental Impact Statement (1987/88)
The proposed project called for a two phase
improvement program to upgrade the East Hampton Airport.
Improvements included construction of additional hangars,
expansion and improvement of runways, etc. The study assessed
the impact on rare and endangered vegetation, wildlife,
groundwater quality and quantity, noise, stormwater runoff
and summer traffic. The Final EIS was adopted by the East
Hampton Town Board in August 1988.
Top
^
Anton Woods:
West Yaphank, New York - Environmental Impact Statement
(1987/88)
Prepared an Impact Statement to assess the
potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed
construction of 304 single family homes on three parcels
totaling 202.9 acres of former farmland. The five potential
impacts of concern were traffic, groundwater, archaeological
resources, wildlife and loss of productive farmland.
Top
^
Southgate University
Park: Brookhaven, New York; Critique of DEIS (1987)
The two general concerns of this project
related to ecological resources and cumulative impacts.
The critique strengthened the DEIS in light of the arguments
built against the project. Particular recommendations included
Pine Barrens ecology and wildlife impact mitigation.
Top
^
St. Lawrence
Psychiatric Center: Environmental Impact Statement (1987/88)
Developed a comprehensive Environmental
Impact Statement for the proposed construction of a new
70 bed building on the St. Lawrence hospital grounds in
Ogdensburg, New York on the Canadian border. The study assessed
the potential impacts on environmental, historical and archeological
resources.
Top
^
Environmental
Impact Statement - Brookhaven Industrial Park (1986)
Prepared a comprehensive Environmental Impact
Statement for a proposed 479 acre Industrial Park in the
Town of Brookhaven in Suffolk County, New York. The study
assessed the potential impact of the project on the Pine
Barrens, traffic, groundwater quality, transportation, community
services, economics, aesthetics, etc.
Top
^
Cove Green:
Coram, New York;
72 Unit Condominium Project - Environmental
Impact Statement (1987)
This comprehensive Environmental Impact
Statement analyzed the environmental impacts associated
with the construction of 72 condominium units on an 11 acre
parcel requiring a change of zone. Impacts analyzed in association
with this project included community character and service,
physical changes to the area, traffic and groundwater quality
and quantity.
Top
^
The Hills: Farmingville,
New York:
308 Unit Townhouse Project - Environmental
Impact Statement (1987/88)
Developed a comprehensive Environmental
Impact Statement for a 308 unit town house project in Farmingville,
NY. The study assessed the potential impacts of primary
concern that included traffic, groundwater, wildlife and
physical changes to the property.
Top
^
Pine Woods
Estates: North Patchogue, New York;
66 Unit Condominium Project - Environmental
Impact Statement (1988)
Project called for construction of 66 one
and two bedroom condominium units in North Patchogue. Impacts
of concern were traffic, groundwater, wildlife and change
of zone.
Top
^
Yaphank Woods:
West Yaphank, New York;
72 Single Family Homes - Environmental
Impact Statement (1987/88)
The Environmental Impact Statement
analyzed the potential impacts associated with a proposed
72 unit single family development to be constructed on 77.4
acres of former farmland in West Yaphank, NY. Potential
environmental impacts examined in the report included traffic,
groundwater, archaeological resources, wildlife and loss
of productive farmland.
Top
^
Springhorn
at Blue Point: Blue Point, New York
Environmental Assessment and Wetland
Flagging (1988)
The proposed project called for the construction
of an adult retirement community. This project required
preparation of a long form environmental assessment form
and participation in the wetland flagging of the property
with representatives of the Town of Brookhaven and the NYSDEC.
Top
^
Spring Meadow:
Wading River, New York;
172 Single Family Units Environmental
Impact Statement (1987/88)
The proposed project called for the construction
of 172 single family homes on 189 acres of former pasture
land in Wading River, NY. The primary environmental impact
areas of concern included loss of open space, (which was
mitigated with the dedication of 102.3 acres to the Town
of Brookhaven), traffic, groundwater quality and physical
changes at the site.
Top
^
Lighthouse
Estates: Montauk Point, New York;
Environmental Impact Statement (1987/88)
This project was proposed for a pristine
area of Montauk. The area is characterized by extensive
wetlands which were flagged by the Town of East Hampton.
The project called for construction of single family homes
on 339 acres. The potential impacts included loss of open
space, wildlife habitat and visual resources. The project
was not developed.
Top
^
The Fairways:
Rocky Point, New York
57 Single Family Units - Environmental
Impact Statement (1988)
Prepared an Environmental Impact Statement
for the proposed construction of 57 single family homes
on a 38 acre golf course, (Tall Trees Golf Course), in Rocky
Point. The potential environmental impacts assessed included
loss of water hazard "wetlands", loss of recreational
space, groundwater and traffic.
Top
^
Sir Charles
Estates: Patchogue, New York;
34 Single Family Unit Environmental
Impact Statement (1988)
The Environmental Impact Statement for the
proposed 34 single family homes on 56.8 acres located on
Mud Creek in East Patchogue assessed the potential environmental
impacts associated with the project including traffic, loss
of open space, terrestrial ecology, cultural resources and
wetlands.
Top
^
Patchogue
Village Condominium Project: Patchogue, New York;
Environmental Impact Statement (1986)
Developed a comprehensive Environmental
Impact Statement for a proposed 69 unit condominium project
on the Patchogue River in the Village of Patchogue, Long
Island, New York. The study assessed the potential impact
of the project on traffic, water quality, the ecology, land
use, transportation, community services, economics, aesthetics
etc.
Top
^
PREVIOUS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS
Browning
Ferris Industries Suffolk Solid Waste Study (1988)
Conducted a two part report on solid waste
management in Suffolk County. Included information on construction
of resource recovery plants and analyzed the concerns and
interests of BFI.
Top
^
Environmental Regulatory
Compliance System:
New York State Facilities Development
Corp. (1986)
Developed a system to assure that the projects
being designed by the New York State Facilities Development
Corporation were being planned in compliance with all appropriate
federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations.
Top
^
Medical
Waste Management In the New York Metropolitan Area Market/Feasibility
Study:
Browning Ferris Industries (1986)
Prepared a study of medical waste disposal
practices in the New York City metropolitan area. The study
was designed to answer questions pertaining to how hospital
wastes and other types of medical wastes were being handled,
regulatory controls, economic and environmental factors
affecting medical waste disposal, and proposed plan of action
the client would take in relation to medical waste disposal.
Top
^
Suffolk
Child Developmental Center: Smithtown, New York;
Environmental Assessment (1987/88)
The proposed project involved two components,
the construction of an addition to the existing administration
building and the construction of a ten bed home for developmentally
disabled children. The project site was within the Wild,
Scenic, Recreational River Corridor of the Nissequogue River.
As such, an environmental assessment was necessary to evaluate
potential impacts to the area as well as potential environmental
liabilities at the subject location. A permit was granted
and the first phase of the project was developed.
Top
^
Concrete
Recycling Study (1987)
Prepared a report for a recycling consortium
on the environmental and economic benefits of concrete recycling
on Long Island. The report concluded that there were five
specific benefits derived from the recycling of concrete.
These are: savings to Long Island taxpayers; preservation
of valuable natural resources; reduction of illegal dumping;
reduced landfilling; and reduction of truck traffic.
Top
^
PROFESSIONAL
PROFILES
The following professional profiles present
an experience outline of some of the principals, staff and
associated consulting experts of MEI.
MEI's staff, coupled with sub-consultant
services and appropriate joint venture services, offers
the client optimum flexibility and the capacity to tailor
fit services to particular project demands.
Top
^
DONALD J. MIDDLETON JR.
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
EDUCATION
Fordham University; College of Business
Administration Bronx, New York.
Bachelors of Science, May 1988. Concentration in Finance.
Completed Undergraduate education in three years.
Iona College, New Rochelle, New York September
1985 - May 1986.
Institute for Asbestos Awareness. January
1989.
New York State and New York City Asbestos Handlers Licenses.
New York City Asbestos Supervisors License, May 1989.
EXPERIENCE
President of Middleton Environmental Incorporated.
October, 2000 to present.
Senior Vice President; Middleton, Kontokosta Associates
Ltd.
May 1988 to October, 2000.
Don Middleton Jr. has been President at
Middleton Environmental Incorporated from May 1990 to present.
Serves as the manager of the Environmental Site Assessment
Program. This program helps lenders to avoid clean up liability
and litigation cost often associated with asbestos and hazardous
waste contaminated properties. Conducting and supervising
field inspection of the subject property, a regulatory agency
search and a survey of past and current property use. A
"Phase One" report is then submitted and if analysis
shows no sign of contamination, the service is concluded.
If contamination is suspected, air water, and soil samples
are collected and a report on the laboratory analyses and
findings is then submitted. This "Phase Two" report
includes mortgage or loan recommendations and clean up costs.
Since 1988, MEI has prepared over 10,000
Environmental Site Assessment & Transaction Screen Process
Reports on commercial, industrial and multi-family properties
for lending institutions in the tri-state area and throughout
the nation. Assessments have also been conducted for real
estate & law firms, the FDIC & RTC.
Don Jr. received his Bachelors of
Science from Fordham University College of Business Administration
in May of 1988 (where he completed his undergraduate education
in three years). Don Jr. attended Iona College in New Rochelle,
New York from September 1985 May 1986. Don Jr. has also
attended the NYU School for Continuing Education where he
received his New York State Department of Health Asbestos
Investigator & Management Planners Licenses in 1993.
Top
^
THOMAS W. ROBINSON,
III
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
EDUCATION
B.S., Civil Engineering, Clemson University,
Clemson, South Carolina, 1997
Extensive course work in structural and environmental engineering.
EXPERIENCE
Certified Environmental Inspector. November
2003 to present.
Thomas W. Robinson III serves as Don Middleton Jr. has served
as a Certified Environmental Inspector at Middleton Environmental
Incorporated from November 2003 to present. Thomas has inspected
over one thousand pieces of commercial and multi-family
apartment buildings for many lending institutions over the
past 6 years.
This program helps lenders to avoid
clean up liability and litigation cost often associated
with asbestos and hazardous waste contaminated properties.
Conducting and supervising field inspection of the subject
property, a regulatory agency search and a survey of past
and current property use. A "Phase One" report
is then submitted and if analysis shows no sign of contamination,
the service is concluded. If contamination is suspected,
air water, and soil samples are collected and a report on
the laboratory analyses and findings is then submitted.
This "Phase Two" report includes mortgage or loan
recommendations and clean up costs.
Top
^
CHRISTOPHER A. KOCH,
P.E.
EDUCATION
Manhattan College. Riverdale, New York.
Bachelor of Engineering, 1978
Masters of Business Administration, 1982.
EXPERIENCE
Senior Project Manager, Middleton Environmental
Incorporated
May 1995 to present
Chris is an engineer who has conducted many
building engineering inspections for various clients. Chris
is a licensed P.E. in the State of New York, North Carolina
and Pennsylvania. Chris also hold a New York State of Environmental
Conservation Wastewater Treatment Operators Permit Class
IIIA.
Top
^
|